Trusted field capture
Bind photos, descriptions, time, location and task context to one inspection record.
QHSE Safety Supervision Platform
Trusted, traceable evidence for every safety inspection.
Built for oil and gas, chemicals, energy and mining, connecting field evidence, corrective actions, acceptance and management visibility in one accountable workflow.
ForOil & gas · Chemicals · Energy · Mining
CoversInspection · Correction · Acceptance · Review
Designed forField teams to enterprise management
The hard parts
One tap in the field, and the rest of the chain runs itself.
The hard part is not knowing that a hazard exists, but proving it was actually resolved — traceable, comparable, under control. These five are where safety teams get stuck.
Slow process, corrections run overdue
Report on the spot, no handwritten forms. Assignment, escalation and monthly ledgers are automatic, so a hazard reaches its owner in minutes.
Photo evidence is easy to fake
Camera-only capture with automatic checks on the photo itself, so authenticity can be verified rather than assumed.
No timeliness — management sees it days later
Reports land in the database immediately, reminders go out in real time, and closure rates and overdue lists update on screen.
Vague locations, re-inspection cannot find the spot
Every photo records BeiDou/GPS coordinates and the positioning accuracy, so a re-inspection returns to the same spot.
Audits are painful, paper records never reconcile
Who did what and when stays on the record; retrieval and ledger export are one click away.
Core capabilities
One system from field capture to management decisions.
Capabilities are organized around the real safety workflow, with clear ownership and traceability across teams and organizational levels.
AI-assisted assessment
Support inspectors with structured suggestions while keeping professional judgment with accountable people.
Closed-loop correction
Assignment, correction, evidence, acceptance and reopening are nodes of one workflow that cannot be skipped.
Organization and scope
Keep permissions and visibility aligned with real organizational responsibility, from group to team.
Safety dashboards
See risks, overdue work and closure progress without waiting for manual summaries.
Audit and review
Preserve the sequence of evidence and actions for later review and continuous improvement.
Tamper-evident records
The full evidence chain behind a single hazard.
Before and after photos are kept in pairs, each carrying time, location, inspector watermark and a hash fingerprint; the workflow beside them shows every node, including a rework loop.
- Camera-only captureAlbum imports are disabled, so old or borrowed photos cannot enter the record.
- Double watermarkA visible watermark is burned in on the client while the server keeps the original fingerprint.
- Multi-source positioningBeiDou and GPS first, with cell and Wi-Fi as fallback, and the accuracy is recorded with the coordinates.
- SHA-256 evidenceEach photo carries a digital fingerprint, so any later change is detectable.
Workflow
A complete path from discovery to verified closure.
Each step has a clear owner, state and evidence requirement. Routing follows who is inspecting and how severe the finding is, so the workflow moves without diluting accountability.
Field report
Record the issue and supporting evidence where the work happens.
Grading
Classify the finding by accident category and severity to pick the right route.
Assignment
Route work to the appropriate organization and accountable person.
Time-boxed correction
Submit the plan and the corrective work against a countdown that is visible to everyone.
Acceptance or rework
Verify the result, or return it with a reason so the task goes back for rework.
Closure and ledger
Close the issue into the ledger with its full evidence and action history.
Overdue items escalate on their own: the countdown turns red, reminders go up the organization, and unfinished records cannot quietly disappear.
Field app
Trusted capture, in your pocket.
The app is built in-house and designed for real sites: weak signal, gloves, noise and explosive atmospheres.
- Offline firstInspection, photos and forms complete without a network; everything syncs automatically once back online, without losing or duplicating records.
- Voice to formWith gloves on and machinery running, one spoken sentence becomes a structured report.
- Positioning through the whole flowReporting, correction and re-inspection all record coordinates, so the same spot can be found again.
- Hardware signature and watermarkWatermark and signature lock each photo together, so tampering shows up.
Hardware-backed signatures are enabled on terminals with a TPM chip and fall back to software signatures otherwise. Intrinsically safe explosion-proof terminals are an optional purchase for hazardous areas.
Product view
See the whole safety picture without losing the details.
Dashboards summarize the current state; every figure can still lead back to the responsible organization, workflow and underlying record.
- Headline metrics at a glanceReported, in correction, overdue, closure rate and on-time rate, on one screen and drillable from group to individual.
- Multi-dimensional trendsCombine category, severity, work type and time, with week-on-week and year-on-year comparison and the most frequent findings.
- Ranking boardUnits are ranked automatically by closure rate, timeliness and activity, so gaps do not need to be argued about.
- Command-center screenMap distribution, live reporting stream and online terminals, ready for the safety committee room.
Standards and assessment
Standard categories and assessment rules are already built in.
Reporting formats, accountability documents and self-assessment material are generated from the same records instead of being rebuilt by hand every time.
GB 6441 category dictionary
The 27 accident categories are built in, so statistics come out in the national standard’s terms.
Digital accountability documents
Assessment clauses become rules the system executes and scores on its own.
Dual-prevention self-assessment
Risk identification and hazard inspection records form the evidence chain the self-assessment needs.
Extension modules
Certificate ledgers with expiry alerts, electronic work permits, training and examination.
Before and after
Same work, two ways of doing it.
Nothing here is about working harder; it is about where the record lives and who has to chase it.
Stage
Before
After
Reporting
Handwrite on site, retype into spreadsheets, then pass it up level by level.
Capture and report on the terminal, even on a weak network.
Timeliness
A finding takes days to reach management.
Minutes to the owner, closure rate on screen in real time.
Authenticity
Photos can be re-shot or added later, and nothing proves otherwise.
Camera-only capture, watermark and hash evidence.
Location
Only a rough description, so re-inspection cannot find the spot.
BeiDou/GPS coordinates with the accuracy recorded.
Routing
Phone calls and verbal reminders; tasks stall.
Automatic assignment, time-boxed correction, automatic escalation.
Audit
Paper forms and spreadsheets scattered around and never reconciling.
Full trail, one-click retrieval and export.
Assessment
Manual reconciliation, disputes, material assembled at the last minute.
Rules score automatically, standard categories built in, self-assessment generated.
What changes
From people assembling data to a system producing it.
Saved effort, prevented incidents, evidence for compliance and something to decide on — in that order.
Efficiency
Safety officers stop spending nights on spreadsheets: reports land in the database on submission, summaries move from weekly to live, and monthly review packs export in one click.
Risk and compliance
Findings no longer stall, the evidence chain is tamper-evident, and standard categories plus self-assessment material are available when an inspection arrives.
Management on the ground
Accountability clauses are executed and scored by the system, and overdue items escalate on their own instead of being negotiated.
Decision support
A live console, a command-center screen and ranking boards give management something comparable to decide on.
Deployment and cooperation
Start with your organization, workflow and data boundaries.
Deployment and integration are determined together according to the project environment. We first understand the real workflow, then propose a verifiable implementation path.